Benchmark: includes VS charat

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here
To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/

const id = '123818727033'
const id_bot = '123818727033B'
const id_local = '123818727033_2'

Tests:

includes
/*When writing async/deferred tests, use `deferred.resolve()` to mark test as done*/ id.includes('_') id_bot.includes('_') id_local.includes('_')
charAt
id.charAt(12) === '_' id_bot.charAt(12) === '_' id_local.charAt(12) === '_'

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
includes
charAt

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one month ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/149.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 149 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

charAt

233.0M/s

includes

231.1M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ charAt	233,012,400 Ops/sec
includes	231,145,136 Ops/sec

includes VS charat (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `includes vs charAt`

Created: one month ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

includes

charAt

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

includes VS charat (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: includes vs charAt

Created: one month ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

includes

charAt

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `includes vs charAt`