Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array flat
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
concat reduce vs concat spread vs flat
Created:
8 months ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Script Preparation code:
/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/ async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() { // This function is optional, feel free to remove it. // await someThing(); }
Tests:
concat reduce
/*When writing async/deferred tests, use `deferred.resolve()` to mark test as done*/ var params = [[ 1, 2 ], [ "hello", true, 7 ]]; var other = params.reduce((acc, val) => acc.concat(val), []);
concat spread
var params = [[ 1, 2 ], [ "hello", true, 7 ]]; var other = [].concat(...params);
flat
var params = [[ 1, 2 ], [ "hello", true, 7 ]]; var other = params.flat();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
concat reduce
concat spread
flat
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
8 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:141.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/141.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 141 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
concat reduce
13538922.0 Ops/sec
concat spread
15177665.0 Ops/sec
flat
17520494.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
reate array by lenght
Assigning new variable
Test array concat
js mul vs pow
Test array ops
Array length to string 1
concat, vs spread, vs push
concat/spread/push
push one by one vs spread
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?