Benchmark: Array flat - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here
To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/
async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() {
    // This function is optional, feel free to remove it.
    // await someThing();
}

Tests:

concat reduce
/*When writing async/deferred tests, use `deferred.resolve()` to mark test as done*/ var params = [[ 1, 2 ], [ "hello", true, 7 ]]; var other = params.reduce((acc, val) => acc.concat(val), []);
concat spread
var params = [[ 1, 2 ], [ "hello", true, 7 ]]; var other = [].concat(...params);
flat
var params = [[ 1, 2 ], [ "hello", true, 7 ]]; var other = params.flat();

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
concat reduce
concat spread
flat

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:141.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/141.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 141 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
concat reduce	13538922.0 Ops/sec
concat spread	15177665.0 Ops/sec
flat	17520494.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Array flat (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: concat reduce vs concat spread vs flat

Created: 8 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

concat reduce

concat spread

flat

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A