Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
reate array by lenght
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
new Array(500).fill(0, 0, 500) vs [...Array(6)].map(x => 0);
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Script Preparation code:
/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/ async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() { // This function is optional, feel free to remove it. // await someThing(); }
Tests:
new Array(500).fill(0, 0, 500)
new Array(500).fill(0)
[...Array(6)].map(x => 0);
[...Array(6)].map(x => 0);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
new Array(500).fill(0, 0, 500)
[...Array(6)].map(x => 0);
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 131 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
new Array(500).fill(0, 0, 500)
2900678.5 Ops/sec
[...Array(6)].map(x => 0);
35458124.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
prepend
prepend
Array creation
Big Array prepend
Clearing Array Variations
Create New Array & Fill it
Create Array Filled with Undefined
ak;ldjf;lakdjf
Set replace
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?