Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
concat/spread/push
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
concat vs spread vs push
Created:
10 months ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Script Preparation code:
/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/ async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() { // This function is optional, feel free to remove it. // await someThing(); }
Tests:
concat
/*When writing async/deferred tests, use `deferred.resolve()` to mark test as done*/ a = [1,2,3]; a = a.concat([4,5,6]);
spread
a = [1,2,3]; a = [...a, ...[4,5,6]];
push
a = [1,2,3]; Array.prototype.push.apply(a, [4,5,6]);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
concat
spread
push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
10 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:140.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/140.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 140 on Ubuntu
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
concat
18986656.0 Ops/sec
spread
10966006.0 Ops/sec
push
28525556.0 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
reate array by lenght
Assigning new variable
Test array concat
Test array concat with larger array
js mul vs pow
test-string-1
classNames
benchmark for benchmarks
concat, vs spread, vs push
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?