Benchmark: includes vs. word starts with

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here
To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/
async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() {
    // This function is optional, feel free to remove it.
    // await someThing();
}

Tests:

Includes
const str = 'abc def ghi'; str.toLowerCase().includes('de');
Word starts with
const str = 'abc def ghi'; str.toLowerCase().split(' ').some(word => word.startsWith('de'));

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Includes
Word starts with

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 134 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Includes	134633008.0 Ops/sec
Word starts with	14913088.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

includes vs. word starts with (version: 1)

Searching for a substring: check whether it appears anywhere in a source string, or whether it appears at the start of a word within the source string

Comparing performance of: Includes vs Word starts with

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Includes

Word starts with

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A