Benchmark: for loop vs. .map 100k

Script Preparation code:

// Create sample data
const array = Array.from({ length: 100000 }, () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 1_000_000));

var manipulateFn = num => {
	return num * 2 * 3;
}

Tests:

.map
var newArray = array.map( i => manipulateFn(i));
for loop
var newArray = []; for (let i=0; i<array.length; i++) { newArray.push(manipulateFn(array[i])); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
.map
for loop

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 134 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

.map

897/s

for loop

644/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ .map	897 Ops/sec
for loop	644 Ops/sec

for loop vs. .map 100k (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `.map vs for loop`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

.map

for loop

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

for loop vs. .map 100k (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: .map vs for loop

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

.map

for loop

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `.map vs for loop`