Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
for loop vs. .map with size
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
.map vs for loop
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
// Create sample data var array = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0]; var manipulateFn = num => { return num * 2 * 3; }
Tests:
.map
var newArray = array.map( i => manipulateFn(i));
for loop
var newArray = new Array(array.length); for (let i=0; i<array.length; i++) { //newArray.push(manipulateFn(array[i])); newArray[i]=manipulateFn(array[i]) }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
.map
for loop
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
5 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:140.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/140.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 140 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
.map
42.6M/s
for loop
41.1M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
.map
42,559,440 Ops/sec
for loop
41,136,440 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks
For Each Vs Map Example Medium
For Each Vs Map Example Medium 2
for loop vs. .map
for loop vs. .map [2]
for loop vs. .map but fast
for loop vs. .map anon
for loop vs. .map anon2
for of loop vs. .map
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?