Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
for loop vs. .map but fast
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
.map vs for loop
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
// Create sample data var array = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0]; var manipulateFn = num => { return num * 2 * 3; }
Tests:
.map
var newArray = array.map( i => manipulateFn(i));
for loop
var newArray = []; var length = array.length for (var i=0; i<length; i++) { newArray.push(manipulateFn(array[i])); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
.map
for loop
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/144.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 144 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
.map
19353142.0 Ops/sec
for loop
7670426.5 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
For Each Vs Map Example Medium
For Each Vs Map Example Medium 2
multiple Map usesage
For Each Vs Map Example Medium1
For Each Vs Map
comparing for vs map vs forEach methods
Hungry js map vs forEach
for loop vs. .map
for loop vs. .map [2]
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?