Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
asdfasdfqer
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
.map vs for loop
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
// Create sample data var array = new Array(1000).fill(1); var manipulateFn = (num, idx) => { return [num, idx]; }
Tests:
.map
var newArray = array.map(manipulateFn);
for loop
var newArray = []; for (let i=0; i<array.length; i++) { newArray.push(manipulateFn(array[i], i)); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
.map
for loop
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 127 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=582639" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Test name
Executions per second
.map
67555.4 Ops/sec
for loop
44746.2 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
multiple Map usesage
comparing for vs map vs forEach methods
for loop vs. .map
for loop vs. .map [2]
for loop vs. .map but fast
for loop vs. .map anon
for loop vs. .map anon2
for of loop vs. .map
for loop vs. .map with size
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?