Benchmark: set vs uniq2 - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.10/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here
To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/
async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() {
    // This function is optional, feel free to remove it.
    // await someThing();
}

Tests:

set
var options = []; for (var i = 0; i < 250000; i++) { options.push({ name: 'person' + i, id: i, }); } var l = [...new Set(options.map(o => o.name))].filter(o => !!o); return l;
lodash
var options = []; for (var i = 0; i < 250000; i++) { options.push({ name: 'person' + i, id: i, }); } return _.uniq(options.map(o => o.name)).filter(o => !!o);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
set
lodash

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 134 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

set

14/s

lodash

13/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ set	14 Ops/sec
lodash	13 Ops/sec

set vs uniq2 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `set vs lodash`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

set

lodash

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

set vs uniq2 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: set vs lodash

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

set

lodash

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `set vs lodash`