Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
undefined to boolean
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Double negation vs Boolean function
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->
Script Preparation code:
/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/ async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() { // This function is optional, feel free to remove it. // await someThing(); }
Tests:
Double negation
console.log(!!undefined);
Boolean function
console.log(Boolean(undefined));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Double negation
Boolean function
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 131 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Double negation
55607.0 Ops/sec
Boolean function
55782.1 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gpt-4o-mini
, generated one year ago):
The benchmark provided focuses on the conversion of `undefined` values into boolean values in JavaScript. It compares two distinct approaches to achieve this: 1. **Double Negation**: This method uses the expression `!!undefined`. The double negation (`!!`) works by first converting the value to a boolean using the bitwise NOT operator (`~`) twice. The first negation converts the value to a boolean representation of its truthiness, while the second negation restores the actual boolean value. 2. **Boolean Function**: This method invokes the `Boolean` constructor function with `undefined` as an argument: `Boolean(undefined)`. The `Boolean` function returns either `true` or `false`, depending on the truthiness of the provided value. In this case, it will explicitly convert `undefined` into `false`. ### Comparison of Options **Double Negation (!!undefined)**: - **Pros**: - It is a concise way to perform the conversion. - Often seen as idiomatic JavaScript; many developers are familiar with this pattern. - Potentially performs slightly faster, as it avoids a function call. - **Cons**: - Might be less readable to novice developers who are unfamiliar with the double negation pattern. **Boolean Function (Boolean(undefined))**: - **Pros**: - Clear and explicit in its intent, making the code more readable and understandable. - More approachable for developers who may not be familiar with JavaScript idioms like double negation. - **Cons**: - Involves a function call, which may introduce a slight overhead compared to the double negation approach. - Some developers might perceive it as a less elegant solution in contexts where brevity is favored. ### Performance Considerations The benchmark results show that both methods have similar performance, with the `Boolean` function slightly outperforming the double negation in this test environment. This indicates that the performance difference might not be substantial enough to influence which method to use definitively. Instead, the choice could be based more on code readability and maintainability. ### Other Alternatives Other approaches to convert `undefined` to a boolean value could include: - **Conditional (Ternary) Operator**: Using `undefined ? true : false`, which provides another explicit way to convert the value. While this method is more verbose, it remains clear. - **Logical OR**: Using `undefined || false`, which replaces `undefined` with `false`, although this approach might lead to subtle bugs if one expects the original value to be preserved. In conclusion, the choice between using double negation and the `Boolean` function may come down to personal or team preferences regarding readability versus brevity, as performance differences are typically minimal. Each approach can be valid depending on the context and audience of the code.
Related benchmarks:
reate array by lenght
Assigning new variable
Benchmark GTM
Test array concat
me vs chatgpt
Luxon vs
Counter Increasement v2
Counter Increasement v4
Counter Increasement v5
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?