Benchmark: For vs Foreach manu

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here
To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/
let test = 0;

function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() {
    test = Math.random();
}

const ar = Array(100000);

Tests:

FOR
for (let i= 0; i < ar.length; i++) { globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction(); }
FOREACH
ar.forEach(() => { globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction(); });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
FOR
FOREACH

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/132.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 OPR/117.0.0.0

Browser/OS: Opera 117 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
FOR	1534.8 Ops/sec
FOREACH	19818.9 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

For vs Foreach manu (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: FOR vs FOREACH

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

FOR

FOREACH

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A