Benchmark: Joining strings 3

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

/*your preparation JavaScript code goes here
To execute async code during the script preparation, wrap it as function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction, example:*/
const a = [];
async function globalMeasureThatScriptPrepareFunction() {
    // This function is optional, feel free to remove it.
    // await someThing();
  	for(let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
      const x = Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000);
      const y = Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000);
      a.push({ x, y });
    }
}

Tests:

join
const d = a.map(path => `${path.x.toFixed(0)},${path.y.toFixed(0)}`).join(' '); `M${d}`
for loop concatenation
let b = 'M'; for(let j = 0; j < a.length; j++) { const point = a[j]; const x = point.x.toFixed(0); const y = point.y.toFixed(0); b += x + ',' + y + ' '; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
join
for loop concatenation

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 133 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
join	22.9 Ops/sec
for loop concatenation	27.2 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Joining strings 3 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: join vs for loop concatenation

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

join

for loop concatenation

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A