Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Set merge
(version: 1)
Comparing performance of:
Spread vs for loop
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
const setA = new Set(); const setB = new Set(); for(i=0; i<10000; i++){ setA.add(i.toString()); setB.add((i + 10000).toString()) }
Tests:
Spread
new Set([...setA, ...setB]);
for loop
for (const value of setB) { setA.add(value); }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Spread
for loop
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 130 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=568232" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Test name
Executions per second
Spread
2563.2 Ops/sec
for loop
2229.9 Ops/sec
Related benchmarks:
Set union forEach vs forOf
for vs for ... of 2
set loop
Object VS new Sets
set.add test4
3333test
for loop length vs length+1
for loop length vs length+1 vs less-equal
Merge+object.keys vs set vs for
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?