Benchmark: Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance12

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="nhngodo">Hi! NHNgodo!</div>

Tests:

Vanilla JS
document.getElementById("nhngodo");
Jquery
$("#nhngodo")

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Vanilla JS
Jquery

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:135.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/135.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 135 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Vanilla JS	1161242.9 Ops/sec
Jquery	1434522.5 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript benchmarks!

**What is being tested?**

The provided benchmark measures the performance of two approaches: Vanilla JS and jQuery DOM manipulation.

**Options compared:**

In this benchmark, we have two options:

1. **Vanilla JS**: This refers to using native JavaScript functions to manipulate the Document Object Model (DOM). In this case, the test is simply accessing an element by its ID.
2. **jQuery**: This is a popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation by providing a jQuery object ($()) and other convenience methods.

**Pros and Cons:**

* **Vanilla JS:**
	+ Pros:
		- No external dependencies (i.e., no extra files to load).
		- Potentially faster execution since there are fewer steps involved.
		- Simpler code, which can lead to better maintainability.
	+ Cons:
		- Requires manual DOM manipulation, which can be error-prone and more complex for large-scale applications.
* **jQuery:**
	+ Pros:
		- Provides a convenient and efficient way to manipulate the DOM.
		- Reduces the amount of code you need to write, making it easier to maintain and extend your application.
	+ Cons:
		- Requires loading an additional JavaScript file (the jQuery library), which can slow down page load times.
		- May introduce some overhead due to the extra complexity of the library.

**Library usage:**

In this benchmark, jQuery is used in its `$()` function to access elements. The `#nhngodo` element is selected using jQuery's selector syntax (`#id`) and then assigned a value. This indicates that jQuery is being used as an external dependency to simplify DOM manipulation.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark, but it does rely on the `document` object and its methods (e.g., `getElementById()`).

**Other alternatives:**

If you're interested in exploring other approaches for DOM manipulation, consider:

1. **React**: A popular front-end library that uses a virtual DOM to optimize rendering.
2. **Angular**: A full-fledged JavaScript framework that provides its own DOM manipulation tools and architecture.
3. **Preact**: A lightweight alternative to React that aims to provide similar functionality with reduced overhead.

Keep in mind that each of these alternatives has its own trade-offs, complexities, and learning curves, so it's essential to choose the one that best fits your project requirements.

Now that you've learned more about this benchmark, do you have any specific questions or would you like me to elaborate on any of the points I mentioned?

Related benchmarks:

Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance12 (version: 0)

Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance12

Comparing performance of: Vanilla JS vs Jquery

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Vanilla JS

Jquery

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):