Benchmark: JS VS jquery 3.5.1 DOM perfomance

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.5.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="nhngodo">Hi! NHNgodo!</div>

Tests:

Vanilla JS
var el = document.getElementById("nhngodo"); el.innerText = "Hi! NHNgodo!";
Jquery
$("#nhngodo").text("Hi! NHNgodo!");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Vanilla JS
Jquery

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 128 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Vanilla JS	574170.0 Ops/sec
Jquery	129010.8 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the benchmark.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: Vanilla JavaScript and jQuery (version 3.5.1) for updating the text content of an HTML element with the ID "nhngodo".

**Options Compared**

The benchmark tests the following options:

1. **Vanilla JavaScript**: This approach uses native JavaScript methods to access and manipulate the DOM.
2. **jQuery**: This is a popular JavaScript library that provides an easier way to interact with the DOM.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

* **Vanilla JavaScript**:
	+ Pros: Generally faster, more lightweight, and doesn't require additional dependencies.
	+ Cons: Requires more manual effort and knowledge of DOM manipulation techniques.
* **jQuery**:
	+ Pros: Easier to use, especially for developers familiar with jQuery, and provides a convenient API for DOM manipulation.
	+ Cons: Adds extra overhead due to the library itself, which can impact performance.

**Library Used**

In this benchmark, jQuery is used as a separate dependency. jQuery provides a convenient way to access and manipulate the DOM using its own API. The `"$()`` function is used to create a jQuery selector, and the `.text()` method is used to update the text content of an element.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. Both Vanilla JavaScript and jQuery use standard JavaScript syntax for DOM manipulation.

**Other Considerations**

When working with the DOM, other considerations come into play, such as:

* **Browser support**: Different browsers may have varying levels of support for specific DOM APIs or jQuery features.
* **Optimization techniques**: Minimizing the number of DOM mutations, using requestAnimationFrame, and employing caching can improve performance in certain scenarios.
* **Library versioning**: Keeping libraries up-to-date with the latest versions can help ensure optimal performance.

**Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternatives to Vanilla JavaScript or jQuery, consider:

1. **React**: A popular front-end library that uses a virtual DOM for efficient updates.
2. **Angular**: A full-fledged JavaScript framework that provides a robust set of tools for building complex applications.
3. **Vue.js**: Another popular front-end framework that offers a simple and flexible way to build web applications.

These alternatives can provide additional features, such as state management, template rendering, and dependency injection, but may require more overhead and learning curve compared to Vanilla JavaScript or jQuery.

Related benchmarks:

JS VS jquery 3.5.1 DOM perfomance (version: 0)

Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance

Comparing performance of: Vanilla JS vs Jquery

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Vanilla JS

Jquery

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):