Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance(vars in prep)
(version: 0)
Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance
Comparing performance of:
Vanilla JS vs Jquery
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <div id="nhngodo">Hi! NHNgodo!</div>
Script Preparation code:
var vel = document.getElementById("nhngodo"); var jel = $("#nhngodo");
Tests:
Vanilla JS
vel.innerText = "Hi! NHNgodo!";
Jquery
jel.text("Hi! NHNgodo!");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Vanilla JS
Jquery
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in this JavaScript microbenchmark. **What's being tested:** The benchmark is comparing the performance of two approaches: 1. **Vanilla JS**: This approach uses native JavaScript functions and methods to manipulate the DOM (Document Object Model). It tests how fast it can update the text content of an element. 2. **JQuery DOM**: This approach uses the jQuery library to manipulate the DOM. Specifically, it tests how fast it can update the text content of an element using jQuery's `text()` method. **Options compared:** The benchmark is comparing two options: 1. Using native JavaScript functions and methods (Vanilla JS) 2. Using jQuery's `text()` method (JQuery DOM) **Pros and Cons of each approach:** **Vanilla JS:** Pros: * Faster execution speed, as it doesn't require loading an external library * More efficient use of resources, as it uses native JavaScript functions Cons: * Requires more manual effort to update the DOM * May not be as easy to use for complex DOM manipulations **JQuery DOM:** Pros: * Easier to use, especially for complex DOM manipulations * Provides a higher-level abstraction, making it easier to focus on logic rather than low-level DOM manipulation Cons: * Slower execution speed due to the overhead of loading and parsing the jQuery library * Requires more resources, as the library needs to be loaded and parsed **Other considerations:** The benchmark also takes into account the **DevicePlatform**, **OperatingSystem**, and **Browser** used in each test run. This allows for a more accurate comparison of performance across different environments. **Library usage:** In this benchmark, jQuery is being used as a library to provide an abstraction layer for DOM manipulation. Specifically, the `text()` method is being used to update the text content of an element. **Special JS feature/syntax:** None are mentioned in this particular benchmark. Now, regarding alternatives: If you're looking for alternative libraries or approaches, here are some options: * For native JavaScript DOM manipulation: + React + Angular (if not using jQuery) + Vue.js * For a lightweight and efficient DOM manipulation library: + Vanilla-JS-Promise polyfills (e.g., promises.js)
Related benchmarks:
JS VS jquery 3.5.1 DOM perfomance
Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance 200120255
Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance(no var)
Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance12
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?