Benchmark: Vanilla JS VS JQuery 3.6.0 DOM perfomance

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.6.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="nhngodo">Hi! NHNgodo!</div>

Tests:

Vanilla JS
var el = document.getElementById("nhngodo"); el.innerText = "Hi! NHNgodo!";
Jquery
$("#nhngodo").text("Hi! NHNgodo!");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Vanilla JS
Jquery

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 128 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Vanilla JS	528578.6 Ops/sec
Jquery	276538.5 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark is comparing the performance of two approaches: Vanilla JavaScript (without any libraries) versus jQuery 3.6.0, a popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation.

**Options Compared**

Two options are compared:

1. **Vanilla JavaScript**: This approach uses native JavaScript features to manipulate the DOM.
2. **jQuery 3.6.0**: This approach uses the jQuery library, which provides a simplified way to interact with the DOM.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

**Vanilla JavaScript:**

Pros:

* Lightweight and efficient
* No dependency on an external library
* Can be more performant for small-scale applications

Cons:

* Requires manual DOM manipulation using native JavaScript methods (e.g., `document.getElementById`, `el.innerText`)
* May require additional code to handle events, animations, and other complex interactions

**jQuery 3.6.0:**

Pros:

* Provides a high-level interface for DOM manipulation, making it easier to write concise and efficient code
* Offers a range of methods for handling common tasks, such as event delegation and animation
* Can be more convenient for larger-scale applications

Cons:

* Adds an external dependency (the jQuery library), which may impact performance or cause issues with certain browsers
* May introduce overhead due to the abstraction layer provided by the library

**Library: jQuery**

jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that provides a simplified way to interact with the DOM. It offers a range of methods for common tasks, such as:

* `$()` selector (e.g., `$("#nhngodo")`)
* `.text()` method (e.g., ` $("#nhngodo").text("Hi! NHNgodo!")`)

jQuery's purpose is to simplify JavaScript development by providing a layer of abstraction between the developer and the DOM.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

There are no special features or syntaxes mentioned in the benchmark. However, it's worth noting that jQuery uses some unique features, such as the `$()` selector and `.text()` method, which may not be immediately familiar to developers without experience with the library.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternatives to Vanilla JavaScript or jQuery, here are a few options:

* **React**: A popular JavaScript library for building user interfaces and handling state changes.
* **Angular**: A JavaScript framework for building complex web applications.
* **Vue.js**: A progressive and flexible JavaScript framework for building web applications.

Each of these alternatives has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice ultimately depends on the specific needs and goals of your project.

In summary, the benchmark is comparing two approaches to DOM manipulation: Vanilla JavaScript (native JavaScript methods) versus jQuery 3.6.0 (a popular JavaScript library). The pros and cons of each approach highlight the trade-offs between lightweight efficiency and convenience, abstraction, and overhead.

Related benchmarks:

Vanilla JS VS JQuery 3.6.0 DOM perfomance (version: 0)

Vanilla JS VS JQuery 3.6.0 DOM perfomance

Comparing performance of: Vanilla JS vs Jquery

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Vanilla JS

Jquery

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):