Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance222
(version: 0)
Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance
Comparing performance of:
Vanilla JS vs Jquery
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <div id="nhngodo">Hi! NHNgodo!</div>
Script Preparation code:
var el = document.getElementById("nhngodo"); var $el = $("#nhngodo");
Tests:
Vanilla JS
el.innerText = "Hi! NHNgodo!";
Jquery
$el.text("Hi! NHNgodo!");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Vanilla JS
Jquery
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks and explore what's tested in this specific benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The provided JSON represents a benchmark that compares the performance of Vanilla JS (native JavaScript) with jQuery DOM manipulation against each other. The benchmark aims to measure which approach is faster when setting the inner text of an HTML element. **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code for both test cases is simple: * For Vanilla JS: `var el = document.getElementById("nhngodo"); var $el = "";` * For jQuery: `var $el = $("#nhngodo");` These lines retrieve a reference to the `#nhngodo` HTML element using `document.getElementById` (Vanilla JS) or `$("#")` (jQuery). **Html Preparation Code** The html preparation code includes a script tag that loads jQuery version 3.1.1 from an external source: `<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>` This ensures that the test environment is consistent and jQuery is available for use. **Individual Test Cases** There are two individual test cases: 1. **Vanilla JS**: The benchmark definition is `el.innerText = "Hi! NHNgodo!";`. This sets the inner text of the retrieved HTML element using a native JavaScript property. 2. **jQuery**: The benchmark definition is `$el.text("Hi! NHNgodo!");`. This uses jQuery's `text()` method to set the inner text of the element. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: * Vanilla JS (native JavaScript) * jQuery DOM manipulation **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach: * **Vanilla JS (native JavaScript)**: + Pros: Lightweight, no additional library dependencies, native performance. + Cons: May require more manual error handling and DOM manipulation. * **jQuery DOM manipulation**: + Pros: Easier to use for complex DOM manipulations, extensive documentation, and community support. However, it introduces an additional library dependency and may have performance overhead. + Cons: Larger bundle size, potential security concerns due to external dependencies. **Library Used** In this benchmark, jQuery is used as the library for DOM manipulation. jQuery provides a simpler and more convenient API for working with HTML elements, but it also adds a layer of abstraction that can affect performance. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** None of the test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax that's worth highlighting. **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative approaches to DOM manipulation, here are a few options: * **Vanilla CSS**: Instead of using `innerText`, you could use CSS properties like `inline-block` and `content` to achieve similar results. * **Other libraries**: Libraries like React or Angular provide their own approaches to DOM manipulation and can be used as alternatives to jQuery. * **Native Web APIs**: The Web APIs for manipulating HTML elements, such as `DOMTokenList`, can also be used as alternatives to jQuery. Overall, the benchmark provides a simple and straightforward comparison of two common approaches to DOM manipulation in JavaScript.
Related benchmarks:
JS VS jquery 3.5.1 DOM perfomance
Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance 200120255
Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance(no var)
Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance(vars in prep)
Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance12
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?