Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Vanilla VS Prototype
(version: 0)
Vanilla VS Prototype
Comparing performance of:
Vanilla vs PrototypeJS
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id="testElement">HelloWorld</div> <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/prototype/1.7.3.0/prototype.js"></script>
Tests:
Vanilla
var el = document.getElementById('testElement'); var className = el.className;
PrototypeJS
var el = $('testElement'); var className = el.className;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Vanilla
PrototypeJS
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition:** The benchmark measures the performance of two approaches: 1. **Vanilla JavaScript**: This approach uses native JavaScript functions without any external libraries or frameworks. 2. **PrototypeJS**: This approach uses the Prototype JavaScript library, which provides additional functionality beyond native JavaScript capabilities. **Options Compared:** In this benchmark, two options are being compared: * Vanilla JavaScript (no external library) * PrototypeJS (with the Prototype library) **Pros and Cons of Different Approaches:** 1. **Vanilla JavaScript**: * Pros: + Lightweight and minimalistic + Native performance + No dependencies on external libraries * Cons: + Limited functionality compared to PrototypeJS + May require more boilerplate code for certain tasks 2. **PrototypeJS**: * Pros: + Provides additional functionality beyond native JavaScript capabilities + Easier to write code due to its syntax extensions * Cons: + Additional dependencies ( Prototype library) + Potential performance overhead due to the extra abstraction layer **Library:** The Prototype library is a popular JavaScript framework that provides a set of utility functions, event handling, and DOM manipulation capabilities. Its primary purpose is to simplify common tasks in JavaScript development. **Special JS Features/Syntax:** This benchmark uses a few features specific to the Prototype library: * `$(selector)`: A shorthand for `Element.get('selector')`, which returns an element object. * `el.className`: Accessing the class attribute of an HTML element using Prototype's syntax extension. **Other Considerations:** 1. **Benchmarking:** This benchmark uses a simple test case that extracts the class name from an HTML element. The goal is to measure the performance difference between Vanilla JavaScript and PrototypeJS in this specific task. 2. **Browser Platform:** The benchmark was run on a Chrome 112 browser with Mac OS X 10.15.7, which may affect the results. **Alternatives:** If you're interested in exploring alternative libraries or approaches, consider: 1. **Lodash**: A popular utility library that provides functional programming capabilities. 2. **JQuery**: A widely-used JavaScript library for DOM manipulation and event handling. 3. **Modern JavaScript frameworks:** Consider using modern JavaScript frameworks like React, Angular, or Vue.js, which provide additional features and performance optimizations. Keep in mind that the choice of library or approach depends on your specific project requirements, team expertise, and personal preferences.
Related benchmarks:
jquery vs vanilla js
Jquery vs vanillaJS test
Create Element v1
JQUERY VS VANILLA v-na1
Vanilla JS VS JQuery DOM perfomance12
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?