Benchmark: jquery vs vanilla js

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="foo">Hello World</div>

Tests:

vanilla js
var el = document.getElementById("foo"); el.innerText = "New Hello World";
jquery script
$("#foo").text("New Hello World");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
vanilla js
jquery script

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark is comparing two approaches: using jQuery and using vanilla JavaScript (native JavaScript without any libraries).

**Options Compared**

Two options are compared:

1. **jQuery**: A popular JavaScript library that provides a convenient way to interact with the DOM, event handling, and other functionality.
2. **Vanilla JavaScript**: Native JavaScript code that doesn't rely on any external libraries.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

**jQuery:**

Pros:

* Easier to write concise and efficient code
* Provides a rich set of functionality out of the box (e.g., DOM manipulation, event handling)
* Well-established community support

Cons:

* Adds extra overhead due to the library itself
* Can be slower than native JavaScript for certain tasks
* May require additional dependencies and setup

**Vanilla JavaScript:**

Pros:

* Faster execution time since it doesn't include the library's overhead
* More control over the code, allowing for optimization and custom implementations
* No additional dependencies or setup required

Cons:

* Can be more verbose and less concise than jQuery code
* Requires more expertise to write efficient and effective code

**Library Used: jQuery**

In the provided benchmark, jQuery is used in the second test case (`"jquery script"`). The library provides a convenient way to update the text content of an element using `$("#foo").text("New Hello World");`. This line of code uses jQuery's shortcut for selecting elements and setting their properties.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The code examples are straightforward and don't rely on any experimental or upcoming features.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternatives to jQuery, some popular options include:

* Lodash: A utility library that provides a large set of functional programming helpers.
* Moment.js: A library for working with dates and times.
* React or Angular (not mentioned in this benchmark): JavaScript frameworks for building complex user interfaces.

For vanilla JavaScript, you can explore libraries like:

* DOMPurify: For sanitizing user-generated content.
* Lodash: For utility functions like array manipulation and string formatting.
* Prettier: A code formatter that helps maintain consistent coding styles.

Related benchmarks:

jquery vs vanilla js (version: 0)

jquery vs vanilla js

Comparing performance of: vanilla js vs jquery script

Created: 8 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

vanilla js

jquery script

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):