Benchmark: Jquery Vs Extensions Vs Native

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
<div class="foo"></div>
<div class="foo"></div>
<div class="foo"></div>
<div class="foo"></div>
<div class="foo"></div>
<div class="foo"></div>
<div class="foo"></div>
<div class="foo"></div>
<div class="foo"></div>
<div class="foo"></div>
<div class="foo"></div>
<div class="foo"></div>
<div class="foo"></div>
<div class="foo"></div>

Tests:

Extension override
var querySelectorSupported = document.querySelectorAll; (function () { var jQueryInitFunc = $.fn.init; $.fn.init = function (selector, context, root) { if (querySelectorSupported && !context && typeof selector === "string" && selector[0] !== "<") { try { selector = document.querySelectorAll(selector); } catch (e) { } } return new jQueryInitFunc(selector, context, root); }; })(); (function () { var jQueryFindFunc = $.fn.find; $.fn.find = function (selector) { if (querySelectorSupported && typeof selector === "string") { try { return $(Array.from(this.get(0).querySelectorAll(selector))); } catch (e) { } } return jQueryFindFunc.apply(this, arguments); }; })(); $(".foo");
Jquery
$(".foo");
Native
document.querySelectorAll(".foo");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Extension override
Jquery
Native

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark measures the performance of three approaches:

1. **Native**: The native implementation, which uses the `document.querySelectorAll` method directly.
2. **Extension override**: A custom implementation that overrides jQuery's `$.fn.init` and `$.fn.find` methods to mimic its behavior using native DOM methods.
3. **JQuery**: The original jQuery library.

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code includes a reference to the jQuery library (`https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js`) and some HTML code with multiple elements having class `foo`.

**Individual Test Cases**

Each test case has a unique benchmark definition that defines a specific scenario:

1. **Extension override**
	* This test case overrides jQuery's `$.fn.init` and `$.fn.find` methods to mimic its behavior using native DOM methods.
	* The custom implementation checks if the `querySelectorSupported` method is available, and if not, tries to execute a native `document.querySelectorAll` call.
2. **JQuery**
	* This test case simply executes jQuery's `$` function on an element with class `foo`.
3. **Native**
	* This test case uses the `document.querySelectorAll` method directly.

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

1. **Extension override**
	* Pros:
		+ Mimics jQuery's behavior using native DOM methods, which might be more efficient.
		+ Allows for better control over the custom implementation.
	* Cons:
		+ Requires manual implementation of jQuery's logic, which can be error-prone and time-consuming.
2. **JQuery**
	* Pros:
		+ Uses a well-known and widely-used library with an extensive community.
		+ Easy to implement and use.
	* Cons:
		+ May introduce additional dependencies and overhead.
3. **Native**
	* Pros:
		+ Does not require any additional libraries or dependencies.
		+ Can be more efficient than using a library like jQuery.
	* Cons:
		+ Requires manual implementation of the desired behavior, which can be error-prone and time-consuming.

**Libraries**

The test cases use the following libraries:

1. **jQuery**: A popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation and event handling.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

There are no special features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition or individual test cases.

**Alternatives**

If you need to compare performance with alternative implementations, here are some options:

* **React**: A popular JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
* **Angular**: Another popular JavaScript framework for building web applications.
* **Vanilla DOM manipulation**: Implementing DOM manipulation logic using only native JavaScript methods, without relying on any libraries.

Note that each of these alternatives has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of implementation will depend on the specific requirements of your project.

Related benchmarks:

Jquery Vs Extensions Vs Native (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Extension override vs Jquery vs Native

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Extension override

Jquery

Native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):