Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Jquery vs vanillaJS test
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
jquery vs vanillaJs
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.2.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <div id='test'></div>
Tests:
jquery
let jquerySelect = $('#test');
vanillaJs
let vanillaJsSelect = document.getElementById('test');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
jquery
vanillaJs
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its results to understand what's being tested. **What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents two individual test cases: 1. `jquery`: This test case checks how fast jQuery can select an HTML element using the `$('#test')` syntax. 2. `vanillaJs`: This test case checks how fast a vanilla JavaScript implementation (without any libraries) can select an HTML element using the `document.getElementById('test')` syntax. **Options being compared** In this benchmark, we have two main options: 1. **jQuery**: A popular JavaScript library that provides an easy way to manipulate HTML elements. 2. **Vanilla JavaScript**: The default JavaScript implementation without any libraries or frameworks. The pros and cons of these approaches are: * **jQuery**: + Pros: Fast and efficient way to select HTML elements, widely adopted and well-maintained. + Cons: Requires an additional library to be included in the project, which can add overhead to the page load. + Additional dependencies: jQuery is a separate file that needs to be loaded before the JavaScript code. * **Vanilla JavaScript**: + Pros: No additional libraries or dependencies required, more lightweight and efficient. + Cons: Requires manual implementation of element selection logic, which can be error-prone and slower. In general, if speed is crucial and you're working on a performance-critical project, vanilla JavaScript might be a better choice. However, if ease of use and maintainability are more important, jQuery is a popular and widely adopted solution. **Library: jQuery** jQuery is a JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation and provides an easy way to select HTML elements. It's particularly useful for dynamic web applications where rapid updates are required. The `$('#test')` syntax is just one of the many selectors provided by jQuery, which allows you to easily target specific elements on a webpage. **Special JS feature: No special features mentioned** There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. It's focused solely on comparing the performance of jQuery and vanilla JavaScript for element selection. **Other alternatives** If you're looking for alternative libraries or approaches, some options include: * **React**: A popular JavaScript library for building reusable UI components. * **Angular**: Another widely adopted JavaScript framework for building complex web applications. * **Vanilla JavaScript alternatives**: Other libraries like Lodash (for functional programming) or Moment.js (for date manipulation) can provide similar functionality to jQuery, but with different syntax and implementations. However, keep in mind that these alternatives might not provide the same level of simplicity and ease of use as jQuery for element selection tasks.
Related benchmarks:
Vanilla vs Jquery OPS/SEC 2
jQuery 3.6.0 vs Vanilla JS
Compare jQuery 3.6.1 vs. 3.2.1 Performance
Jquery vs vanila
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?