Browse the latest JavaScript performance benchmarks created by the community.
No description provided
Is Math.hypot actually faster than Math.sqrt?
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided
reduce slice performance
Will use a function that creates steps(one side of a christmas tree)
Map get VS Map has get
No description provided
To use browser's atob() or btoa(), we need to convert between bytes and so-called "binary" string. This test converts "binary" string to bytes, for working with results from atob() calls, which decodes base64 to bytes (in the form of binary string).
To use browser's atob() or btoa(), we need to convert between bytes and so-called "binary" string. This test convert bytes to "binary" string, for future calls of btoa(), i.e. encoding bytes (in the form of binary string) to base64.
Test
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided
Test the speed and memory usage using 5 different techniques for constructing class objects.
MeasureThat.net now supports Python in-browser benchmarks via Pyodide. This new feature allows users to write and execute Python code directly within their web browser, enabling seamless performance testing and benchmarking of Python scripts. (added in v1.7.0)
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided
Comparing performance of: jquery 2.2.4 vs 2.1.1
No description provided
No description provided
Testing a functional programming method 'pluck'. This is an in-progress test. Taken from lodash source code, using the Array constructor to make an Array of a specified length, seems to have a considerable impact on performance. In my simple pluck implementation, not using the constructor e.g. const plucked = [], was considerably slower.
No description provided