Browse the latest JavaScript performance benchmarks created by the community.
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
test
spread vs assign
Is there a performance benefit to replacing ! with === 0?
Creating a "new" array reference every time
Creating a "new" array reference every time
No description provided
selectoptions
selectoptions
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
No description provided
No description provided
string concat vs template literals (10 vars)
Test the performance of replace() vs substring() vs slice() when replacing a char at the beginning of a (in this case uri query-)string that may or may not be there. Added the combined brackets[ ] + substr() method, since it's always the first char we wan't to pop off. Inspired by https://jsperf.com/replace-or-substr. Note: could not get 'let' and 'const' to work. Well, too bad...
No description provided
No description provided
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method and push
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
No description provided
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided
No description provided