Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operatordsvsdxvse
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks! **What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents a benchmark test on the Array.prototype.concat method and the new ES6 spread operator. The test compares the performance of these two approaches in concatenating an array with another array containing some elements. **Options compared:** Two options are being compared: 1. **Array.prototype.concat()**: This is the traditional method for concatenating arrays in JavaScript. It takes multiple arrays as arguments and returns a new array that contains all the elements from both arrays. 2. **Spread operator (new ES6 syntax)**: The spread operator (`...`) allows you to expand an iterable (such as an array) into separate arguments to a function, or merge two iterables into a single one. **Pros and cons of each approach:** 1. **Array.prototype.concat()**: * Pros: + Wide browser support + Easy to use and understand * Cons: + May not be as efficient as the spread operator, especially for large arrays 2. **Spread operator (new ES6 syntax)**: * Pros: + More concise and readable + Can be faster than concat() for large arrays * Cons: + May not work in older browsers that don't support ES6+ + Requires a good understanding of the new syntax **Library usage:** There is no explicit library used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some browser engines may use internal libraries or optimizations for array manipulation. **Special JS features or syntax:** The spread operator (`...`) is a relatively new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows you to expand an iterable into separate arguments to a function, making code more concise and readable. However, it may not work in older browsers that don't support ES6+. **Other alternatives:** If the spread operator is not supported, other alternatives for concatenating arrays include: 1. Using `Array.prototype.push()`: You can use `push()` method to add elements to an array. ```javascript var arr = [1, 2]; arr.push(3); ``` 2. Using `Array.prototype.concat()` with multiple arguments: This is similar to the spread operator, but uses separate function calls instead of a single expression. ```javascript var arr = [1, 2]; var newArr = Array.prototype.concat.apply([], [arr]); newArr.push(3); ``` In conclusion, the benchmark test compares two approaches for concatenating arrays in JavaScript: the traditional `Array.prototype.concat()` method and the new ES6 spread operator. The spread operator offers better performance and conciseness but requires a good understanding of the new syntax and may not work in older browsers.
Related benchmarks:
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operatordsvsdxvseafawfawfawf
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?