Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
normal function find vs arrow function find
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
array normal fucntion find vs array arrow fucntion find
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.core.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var users = [ { 'user': 'joey', 'age': 32 }, { 'user': 'ross', 'age': 41 }, { 'user': 'chandler', 'age': 39 } ]
Tests:
array normal fucntion find
// Native users.find(function (o) { return o.age < 40; })
array arrow fucntion find
users.find(o => o.age < 40)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
array normal fucntion find
array arrow fucntion find
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches for finding an element in an array: traditional function-based approach using `concat()` method, and arrow function-based approach using the new ES6 spread operator (`=>` syntax). **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **Traditional Function-Based Approach**: The first option uses a traditional function-based approach to find an element in an array. This approach is still widely used today. 2. **Arrow Function-Based Approach with Spread Operator**: The second option uses arrow functions and the new ES6 spread operator (`=>`) to achieve the same result. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief overview of the pros and cons of each approach: **Traditional Function-Based Approach** Pros: * Widely supported and understood * Easy to read and maintain * No unnecessary dependencies or syntax Cons: * Can be slower than other approaches due to the `concat()` method overhead * More verbose than arrow functions **Arrow Function-Based Approach with Spread Operator** Pros: * Concise and expressive syntax * Faster execution performance compared to traditional function-based approach * No need for explicit concatenation of arrays Cons: * May require additional knowledge of new ES6 syntax * Not supported in older browsers or environments **Library Used: Lodash.js** The benchmark uses the Lodash.js library, which provides a `find()` method for array filtering. The library is not essential to the comparison itself but is used to provide a standardized way to execute the benchmarks. **Special JS Feature/Syntax: ES6 Spread Operator** The benchmark takes advantage of the new ES6 spread operator (`=>`) syntax, which allows for concise and expressive arrow function definitions. This feature is not necessary for understanding the basic concepts of array filtering, but it's an important aspect of modern JavaScript development. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring other approaches to finding elements in arrays, here are some alternatives: * **Using `Array.prototype.find()` method**: This is a more modern approach that's gaining popularity. It's similar to the arrow function-based approach but uses a built-in method instead. * **Using regular expressions**: You can use regular expressions to achieve array filtering, although this approach might be slower than other methods. Overall, this benchmark provides a useful comparison between two approaches for finding elements in arrays, highlighting the benefits and trade-offs of each method.
Related benchmarks:
native find vs lodash _.find
native find vs lodash _.find hey joe
native find vs lodash _.find_fork
native find vs for..in
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?