Benchmark: JQuery vs Vanilla testtest

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="test">Hi! Change this text to something awesome!</div>

Tests:

Jquery
$("#test").text("Hi! This is a test! Which are stronger? JQuery or Vanilla JS");
Vanilla JS
var el = document.getElementById("test"); el.innerText = "Hi! This is a test! Which are stronger? JQuery or Vanilla JS";

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Jquery
Vanilla JS

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the benchmark definition and test cases to explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of different approaches.

**Benchmark Definition:**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking framework called MeasureThat.net. The benchmark definition is a string that describes the test case:

"{
    \"Name\": \"JQuery vs Vanilla testtest\",
    \"Description\": null,
    \"Script Preparation Code\": null,
    \"Html Preparation Code\": \"<script src=\"https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js\"></script>\r\n<div id=\"test\">Hi! Change this text to something awesome!</div>\""
}"

The script preparation code is empty, which means that the script being tested does not need any additional setup before execution. The HTML preparation code includes a jQuery library and sets up an HTML element with the id "test" that will be used in the test case.

**Individual Test Cases:**

There are two individual test cases:

[
    {
        \"Benchmark Definition\": \"$(\"#test\").text(\"Hi! This is a test! Which are stronger? JQuery or Vanilla JS\");\",
        \"Test Name\": \"Jquery\"
    },
    {
        \"Benchmark Definition\": \"var el = document.getElementById(\"test\");\r\nel.innerText = \"Hi! This is a test! Which are stronger? JQuery or Vanilla JS\";\",
        \"Test Name\": \"Vanilla JS\"
    }
]"

These two test cases compare the performance of jQuery and Vanilla JavaScript (built-in JavaScript without any additional libraries) in updating the text content of an HTML element with id "test".

**What's being compared:**

The two test cases are comparing the performance of:

1. jQuery, a popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation.
2. Vanilla JavaScript, the native JavaScript language without any additional libraries.

**Pros and Cons of different approaches:**

* **jQuery:**
	+ Pros:
		- Provides a simple and intuitive way to manipulate the DOM.
		- Often used in web development due to its widespread adoption.
		- Includes many built-in methods for common tasks, such as $(#id).text(text).
	+ Cons:
		- Adds additional overhead compared to Vanilla JavaScript.
		- May not be the best choice for small-scale or simple projects.
* **Vanilla JavaScript:**
	+ Pros:
		- Lightweight and optimized for performance.
		- Provides more control over DOM manipulation.
		- Suitable for smaller-scale or complex projects.
	+ Cons:
		- Requires more boilerplate code to achieve the same results as jQuery.

**Library Used:**

In this benchmark, the jQuery library is included via a script tag in the HTML preparation code. The `$.` notation is used to access DOM elements and methods.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax:**

None of the test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax that require specific explanations.

Related benchmarks:

JQuery vs Vanilla testtest (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Jquery vs Vanilla JS

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Jquery

Vanilla JS

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):