Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Plus one
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
++ vs += 1
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var start = 1;
Tests:
++
start++;
+= 1
start += 1;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
++
+= 1
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros/cons. **Benchmark Definition:** The benchmark definition is a simple JavaScript expression that increments a variable `start` by 1 using two different methods: * `++`: post-increment operator * `+= 1`: prefix increment assignment These expressions are used to test the performance difference between these two operators. **Test Cases:** There are two individual test cases: 1. `"++"` * Benchmark Definition: `start++;` * Test Name: `++` (post-increment operator) 2. `"+= 1"` * Benchmark Definition: `start += 1;` * Test Name: `+ = 1` (prefix increment assignment) **Options Compared:** The benchmark is comparing the performance of two different operators: 1. **Post-increment operator (`++`)** * Pros: + Can be used in expressions and loops. + Less prone to issues like "variable hoisting" or unexpected behavior in certain contexts (e.g., when used with `let` or `const` declarations). * Cons: + Might incur additional overhead due to the need to evaluate the expression before incrementing. 2. **Prefix increment assignment (`+= 1`)** * Pros: + Can be more efficient, as it only increments the variable and does not require evaluating an expression first. * Cons: + May lead to issues in certain contexts, such as when used with `let` or `const` declarations. **Library Used:** In this benchmark, there is no specific library being tested. The test cases are using built-in JavaScript operators. **Special JS Feature/Syntax:** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being explicitly tested in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the use of `let` and `const` declarations might impact the behavior of these tests, as the post-increment operator can behave differently depending on whether the variable is declared with `let`, `const`, or `var`. **Alternatives:** Other alternatives to test these operators could include: * Using a different incrementing method, such as `start = start + 1;` ( postfix increment) * Testing with larger increments or more complex expressions * Examining the performance of these operators in various contexts, such as: + Loops + Expressions + Array operations Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be directly relevant to the specific use case being tested and may require modifications to the benchmark definition.
Related benchmarks:
Plus equals is slow
Plus equals is slow
Plus equals is slow
Plus equals is slow 333
Finite vs Multiples Only
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?