Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Plus equals is slow
(version: 0)
Why the hell
Comparing performance of:
Plus equals vs Plus
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Plus equals
let x = 0; for (var i=0; i < 1000; i++) { x += 2 + i; }
Plus
let x = 0; for (var i=0; i < 1000; i++) { x = x + 2 + 1 }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Plus equals
Plus
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the benchmark and its test cases, explaining what's being tested, compared options, pros/cons, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The provided `Json` file represents a benchmark definition for "Plus equals is slow". The description is cryptic ("Why the hell"), but it seems to be testing the performance of adding two numbers using the `+=` operator versus a more traditional addition assignment (`x = x + 2 + 1`) in a loop. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **"Plus equals"**: This benchmark definition is identical to the first line of the script: ```javascript let x = 0; for (var i=0; i < 1000; i++) { x += 2 + i; } ``` This is essentially a simple loop that increments `x` using the `+=` operator. 2. **"Plus"**: This benchmark definition uses a more traditional addition assignment: ```javascript let x = 0; for (var i=0; i < 1000; i++) { x = x + 2 + 1; } ``` This is similar to the previous test case, but with parentheses around the `+` operator. **Comparison** The two test cases are comparing the performance of using the `+=` operator versus a more traditional addition assignment. The pros and cons of these approaches: * **`+=` operator**: + Pros: concise, easy to read + Cons: potentially slower due to the need to calculate a temporary value on the fly * **Traditional addition assignment (`x = x + 2 + 1`)**: + Pros: may be faster since it avoids calculating a temporary value + Cons: less concise and harder to read **Library** In both test cases, there is no explicit library being used. However, the use of `var` for declaring the loop variable `i` suggests that this benchmark might be targeting older browsers or environments where strict mode has not been enabled. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these test cases. **Other Considerations** When running benchmarks like this, it's essential to consider factors like: * Cache locality: How does the loop iterate affect cache usage and performance? * Branch prediction: Will the CPU correctly predict which branch to take (in this case, whether to use `+=` or traditional addition assignment)? * Overhead of function calls: Are there any unnecessary function calls or allocations that could impact performance? **Alternatives** Other alternatives for testing similar benchmarks might include: * Using a more modern loop variable declaration syntax (e.g., `let i = 0;`) * Adding more complex operations to the loop (e.g., multiplication, division) * Using different data structures or algorithms (e.g., arrays vs. linked lists) * Including additional test cases for edge cases (e.g., negative numbers, NaNs) Keep in mind that benchmarking can be a complex and nuanced field, and the specific options and considerations will depend on the target browser, hardware, and use case.
Related benchmarks:
Math.pow vs ** vs * forcing floats vs bigint
JS BigInt multiply vs addition
Math.round vs Bitwise
toFixed vs toPrecision vs Math.round() feat. Math.pow
remainder or floor 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?