Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Plus equals is slow
(version: 0)
Why the hell
Comparing performance of:
Plus equals vs Plus
Created:
9 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Plus equals
let x = 0; for (var i=0; i < 1000; i++) { x += 2 + i; }
Plus
let x = 0; for (var i=0; i < 1000; i++) { x = x + 2 + i; }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Plus equals
Plus
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested, compared, and other considerations. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a simple JavaScript snippet that demonstrates a specific use case: comparing the performance of two ways to add numbers in a loop. The code defines a variable `x` and increments it by `2 + i` or simply `x + 2 + i` in each iteration of a loop. **Options Compared** Two options are being compared: 1. **Plus equals**: This is when the expression `x += 2 + i` is used, which increments `x` directly. 2. **Plus**: This is when the expression `x = x + 2 + i` is used, which assigns a new value to `x`. **Pros and Cons** * **Plus equals**: * Pros: Can be slightly faster because it avoids an extra assignment operation. In some cases, this can lead to a small performance boost. * Cons: May not be immediately clear to developers due to its unusual syntax. This can lead to confusion when debugging or reading the code. * **Plus**: * Pros: Easier to read and understand because it uses a more conventional assignment operation (`=`). * Cons: Can be slightly slower than `plus equals` due to the extra assignment. **Library Usage** In this benchmark, no libraries are explicitly mentioned or used. However, some JavaScript engines might use optimizations or built-in functions that could affect performance, but these would not be considered "libraries" in the classical sense. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The code uses standard JavaScript syntax and doesn't involve any advanced features like async/await, destructuring, or object methods. **Other Considerations** When evaluating performance differences between `plus equals` and `plus`, it's essential to consider the following: * **Readability**: While `plus` might be easier to understand due to its more conventional syntax, this comes at a potential cost in terms of readability. * **Maintenance**: When using `plus equals`, developers may need to look beyond the initial code snippet to comprehend what's happening. This can make maintenance more difficult if they're not familiar with this particular pattern. **Alternative Approaches** If you were to create an alternative benchmark, you might consider testing other ways to add numbers in a loop, such as: * **Using `let` and `const`**: You could explore the performance of using different assignment operators or scoping rules for variables. * **Native WebAssembly support**: If supported by your JavaScript engine, you could test the performance benefits of compiling code to WebAssembly (WASM) for execution. * **Loop optimization techniques**: This might involve testing specific loop optimizations such as loop unrolling, dead code elimination, or register allocation. Feel free to ask any further questions.
Related benchmarks:
Math.pow vs ** vs * forcing floats vs bigint
JS BigInt multiply vs addition
Math.round vs Bitwise
toFixed vs toPrecision vs Math.round() feat. Math.pow
remainder or floor 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?