Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Regex vs split/join22368556564
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Regex vs Split and Join
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str = '100000,123 USD 200000,459 U.SD';
Tests:
Regex
str.replace(/\d\.\d/gm, (x) => x.replace('.', ''))
Split and Join
str.split(/\d\.\d/gm).join('')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Regex
Split and Join
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark measures the performance of two approaches to remove decimal points from numbers in a string: 1. **Regex**: Uses regular expressions to replace the decimal points with an empty string. 2. **Split and Join**: Splits the string into individual numbers using a regular expression, removes the decimal point, and then joins them back together. **Options Compared** The two options are compared for their performance in terms of execution speed (ExecutionsPerSecond). **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Regex**: * Pros: Generally faster and more flexible than split and join. * Cons: Can be slower for very large strings or complex patterns, may require additional resources to compile the pattern. 2. **Split and Join**: * Pros: Easier to understand and implement, can be more readable, but may not be as efficient as regex for complex operations. * Cons: May lead to unnecessary overhead due to string splitting and joining. **Library Used** None explicitly mentioned in the provided JSON, but `str.replace()` uses a built-in JavaScript method, while `str.split()` and `join()` use methods from the String prototype. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The `gm` flag used in the regular expression patterns is not a standard feature of JavaScript regex. It's likely a custom extension or an adaptation for this benchmark to achieve faster performance by ignoring case and multiline flags. This might be specific to the environment or implementation being tested. **Other Alternatives** 1. **Using a library like ` numeral.js`**: Instead of using built-in methods, some developers might use external libraries specifically designed for number formatting and manipulation. 2. **Native WebAssembly (WASM) compilation**: Modern browsers support compiling JavaScript code into WASM modules. This approach can potentially provide significant performance improvements by allowing the browser to execute native code directly. 3. **Using a custom implementation in C++ or another language**: For extremely high-performance benchmarks, some developers might choose to implement the logic in a different language (e.g., C++) and then integrate it with JavaScript through an API or interop. The choices of libraries, syntax, or compilation methods can significantly impact performance and readability. As software engineers, it's essential to consider these factors when writing code for specific use cases and optimize accordingly. In this benchmark, the split and join approach takes a slight lead in terms of execution speed, but the difference is not dramatic. This result might vary depending on the specific environment, hardware, and version of JavaScript being used.
Related benchmarks:
str split vs regex replace
Regex vs split/join checking alphanumeric big number
Regex vs split/join checking
Regex vs split/join 23313
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?