Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Regex vs split/join checking alphanumeric big number
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Regex vs Split and Join
Created:
4 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str = '1873189741874817';
Tests:
Regex
/^[0-9]{1,20}$/.test(str);
Split and Join
str.length < 20 && str.split('').every(x => !isNaN(x));
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Regex
Split and Join
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data to understand what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object that contains two test cases: 1. `"Regex"`: This test case uses a regular expression (`/^[0-9]{1,20}$/`) to check if the input string `str` is alphanumeric and has no more than 20 digits. 2. `"Split and Join"`: This test case uses JavaScript's built-in string methods `split()` and `every()`, along with the `isNaN()` function, to check if all characters in the input string are numeric and have a length less than 20. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: * **Regex**: Uses a regular expression to match the input string. * **Split and Join**: Uses JavaScript's built-in string methods `split()`, `every()`, and `isNaN()` to check the input string. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **Regex:** Pros: * Can be more efficient for simple pattern matching. * Allows for more flexibility in terms of patterns and validation rules. Cons: * Can be slower for complex patterns or large input strings. * May require more time to write and optimize the regex pattern. **Split and Join:** Pros: * Typically faster than using regular expressions, especially for small input strings. * More intuitive and easier to understand for developers familiar with JavaScript's string methods. Cons: * May not be as flexible in terms of validation rules or patterns. * Requires more code to implement the test logic. **Other Considerations** * The use of `isNaN()` is a common pattern in JavaScript, but it may not work correctly for all types of numeric values (e.g., NaN, Infinity). * The benchmarking results indicate that the "Regex" option performs better than the "Split and Join" option on this particular test case. **Library Usage** None of the provided test cases use any external libraries. They rely solely on JavaScript's built-in methods and syntax. **Special JS Features or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these test cases. The regular expression pattern is a standard feature, and the `split()`, `every()`, and `isNaN()` functions are all part of the JavaScript language. **Alternatives** If you were to modify this benchmark or create new ones, some alternative options could be: * Using other regular expression patterns (e.g., `\d+` instead of `/^[0-9]{1,20}$/`) * Implementing a custom algorithm for string validation * Using a different set of test cases or input strings to evaluate the performance of each option Keep in mind that the best approach will depend on the specific requirements and constraints of your project.
Related benchmarks:
Regex vs split/join22368556564
str split vs regex replace
Regex First Name split vs match - no console
Regex vs split/join checking
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?