Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
str split vs regex replace
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
split vs regex
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var str = '1234563242347.341342345'; var regex = /\..*$/;
Tests:
split
str.split('.')[0];
regex
str.replace(regex, '');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
split
regex
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:133.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/133.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 133 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
regex
22.5M/s
split
13.5M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
regex
22,511,514 Ops/sec
split
13,533,983 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation. **Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for splitting or replacing a string: using the `str.split()` method versus using regular expressions (regex). The goal of this benchmark is to determine which approach performs better in terms of execution speed. **Options Compared** Two options are compared: 1. **`str.split('.')[0]`**: This option uses the `split()` method with a dot (`.`) as the separator and then selects the first substring using indexing (`[0]`). The purpose of this method is to split the input string at the decimal point and return only the part before the decimal. 2. **`str.replace(regex, '')`**: This option uses regular expressions (regex) to replace all occurrences of a pattern with an empty string (`''`). In this case, the regex pattern `\\..*//` is used to match any character followed by zero or more asterisks (`.*`), effectively removing everything after the first dot (`.`). **Pros and Cons** Both approaches have their trade-offs: 1. **`str.split('.')[0]`**: * Pros: Simple, easy to understand, and widely supported. * Cons: May not work correctly for strings containing multiple dots or different separators (e.g., commas). 2. **`str.replace(regex, '')`**: * Pros: Flexible and can handle complex patterns, but may be slower due to the overhead of regular expressions. * Cons: Can be more difficult to read and understand, especially for beginners. **Other Considerations** When choosing between these two approaches, consider the following: 1. **Complexity**: If you need to handle strings with multiple dots or different separators, `str.split('.')[0]` might not work as expected. 2. **Performance**: For large datasets or high-performance applications, using regular expressions might incur additional overhead, making `str.split('.')[0]` a better choice. **Library and Special JS Features** The benchmark uses the `str` variable to represent the input string and defines two scripts: one for splitting and another for replacing. There are no external libraries used in this benchmark. Additionally, there are no special JavaScript features mentioned (e.g., async/await, arrow functions). **Alternative Approaches** If you need to handle similar tasks, consider these alternative approaches: 1. **Using `str.match()` instead of `split()`:** ```javascript var match = str.match(/^...$/); ``` This approach matches the pattern at the beginning (`^`) and end (`$`) of the string using regular expressions. 2. **Using a library like Moment.js for date manipulation:** Moment.js provides a convenient API for working with dates, including parsing decimal points. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics or requirements compared to the original benchmark.
Related benchmarks
Float string optimization: parseFloat() vs regex, full version
Regex vs split/join 23313
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?