Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
push vs spread boogerlad
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
push vs spread
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
push
let a = [9, 6, 7, 3]; a.push(1);
spread
let a = [9, 6, 7, 3]; a = [...a, 1];
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
push
spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Explanation** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark named "push vs spread boogerlad". This benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: using the `push()` method and using the spread operator (`...`) to add elements to an array. **Push() Method** The push() method adds one or more elements to the end of an array and returns the new length of the array. It's a simple and widely supported method for adding elements to an array. Pros: * Easy to read and understand * Widely supported across different browsers and versions * No need to import any libraries Cons: * Can be slower than using the spread operator for large arrays, as it involves updating the internal array length property * May incur additional memory allocations if the push() method needs to dynamically allocate new memory **Spread Operator** The spread operator (`...`) is a modern JavaScript feature that allows you to expand an iterable (such as an array) into separate arguments. When used with assignment, it creates a new copy of the original array and assigns it to a new variable. Pros: * Can be faster than using push() for large arrays, as it involves fewer memory allocations and updates * Allows for more flexibility in adding elements to an array Cons: * Introduced in ECMAScript 2015, so may not support older browsers or versions * May require additional library imports (e.g., if using modern JavaScript features) * Can be less readable than push() for some developers **Library Usage** There is no explicit library usage mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's worth noting that some benchmarks might use libraries like `Benchmark.js` or `jsperf` to simplify benchmarking and measurement. **Special JS Features/Syntax** The provided JSON doesn't mention any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond the spread operator (introduced in ECMAScript 2015). If you're interested in exploring other advanced JavaScript features, you might consider checking out WebAssembly, async/await, or modern language features like `let` and `const`. **Other Alternatives** For testing array operations, you might want to explore alternatives like: 1. **Array.prototype.splice()**: Instead of using push() or spread(), this method modifies the original array by adding or removing elements at a specified index. 2. **Buffer API**: For working with binary data and large arrays, the Buffer API provides efficient operations for working with buffers, which can be used to store and manipulate binary data in memory. 3. **WebAssembly**: If you're targeting modern browsers or Node.js environments, WebAssembly (WASM) provides a way to write high-performance code that runs directly on the CPU, without relying on JavaScript's performance limitations. Overall, the push() method and spread operator are both widely supported and effective ways to add elements to an array in JavaScript. The choice between them ultimately depends on your specific use case and performance requirements.
Related benchmarks:
spread operator vs push test - correct
spread operator... vs push()
spread operator vs push Brian
JS array spread operator vs push
Array .push() vs spread operator
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?