Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
spread operator vs push test - correct
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with and push Comparing performance of spread operator vs Push
Comparing performance of:
Spread Operator vs Push
Created:
6 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Spread Operator
var other = [ 1, 2, ...[ "hello", true, 7 ] ]
Push
var other = [ 1, 2 ].push("hello", true, 7);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Spread Operator
Push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 131 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Spread Operator
41381448.0 Ops/sec
Push
54031988.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and discussed. **Benchmark Overview** The test measures the performance difference between two approaches in JavaScript: using the spread operator (`...`) to concatenate arrays, versus using `push()` with multiple arguments. The goal is to compare which approach is faster for a specific use case. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two options: 1. **Spread Operator**: Using the spread operator (`...`) to create a new array by concatenating another array. 2. **Push() with Multiple Arguments**: Using `push()` method to add multiple elements to an existing array. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **Spread Operator**: + Pros: More concise, readable code; can be used for other types of concatenations (e.g., arrays with objects). + Cons: Can lead to confusion if not understood by all developers; might be slower due to the need to create a new array. * **Push() with Multiple Arguments**: + Pros: More traditional and familiar syntax; no overhead of creating a new array. + Cons: Less concise, less readable code; can lead to multiple function calls, which might be slower. **Library/Function Used** There is no explicit library or function being used in this benchmark. The `push()` method is a built-in JavaScript function for adding elements to an array. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The benchmark leverages the new ES6 spread operator feature (`...`) and the `push()` method with multiple arguments, which are both widely supported in modern browsers and Node.js environments. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches or optimizing your code further, here are some additional options to consider: * Using `concat()` instead of spread operator: `var other = [ 1, 2, ].concat([ "hello", true, 7 ])` * Using a library like Lodash for array manipulation: `_arr.push.apply(other, ["hello", true, 7])` * Exploring more efficient data structures or algorithms, such as using an array with `unshift()` instead of `push()` Keep in mind that these alternatives might change the performance characteristics of your code, and you should test them to determine which one best suits your needs. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
another test 2
Math.pow vs ** vs * forcing floats vs bigint
toFixed vs toPrecision vs Math.round() vs Math.floorfast vs new Math.trunc str dynamic
toFixed vs toPrecision vs Math.round() with constant multiplier
toFixed vs Math.round() sd6f54sd6f54s6df54ds6f
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?