Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
spread operator vs push Brian
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method and push
Comparing performance of:
spread operator vs Push
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
spread operator
var params = [ 1, 2 ]; var other = [ ...param, 3 ];
Push
var params = [ 1, 2 ]; var other = params.push(3);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
spread operator
Push
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Understanding the Benchmark** MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks, which are small scripts designed to measure the performance of specific JavaScript features or syntax. The provided benchmark definition json represents a comparison between two approaches: the new ES6 spread operator (`...`) and the traditional `concat()` method and `push` functions. The script preparation code and HTML preparation code are empty, indicating that no additional setup is required for the benchmark. **Options Compared** Two options are compared in this benchmark: 1. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: This is a new JavaScript syntax introduced in ES6 that allows creating a new array by spreading elements from an existing array. 2. **Concat() Method and Push Functions**: These are traditional methods used to add elements to an array. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** **Spread Operator (`...`)** Pros: * More concise and expressive code * Can be more efficient in certain situations (e.g., creating a new array with a subset of elements) Cons: * May have performance implications due to the creation of a new array object * Not all browsers support it yet (although it's widely supported in modern browsers) **Concat() Method and Push Functions** Pros: * Widespread browser support * Easy to implement and understand Cons: * Can result in slower performance due to the repeated concatenation of arrays or the use of push to modify an array in place. **Library Usage** The test case uses the `Array.prototype.push()` method, which is a standard JavaScript method for adding elements to the end of an array. This method is widely supported and does not require any specific library inclusion. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in alternative approaches to the spread operator or concatenation methods, here are a few options: * Using `Array.prototype.slice()` with `concat()` and `push()`: This approach would involve creating a new array using `slice()` and then concatenating elements using `concat()`, followed by adding an element using `push()`. * Using `Array.prototype.reduce()` or other reduction methods: These methods can be used to add elements to an array in a more efficient way than traditional concatenation. Keep in mind that the best approach depends on the specific use case and requirements. MeasureThat.net is primarily designed for benchmarking JavaScript performance, so it's essential to follow their guidelines and recommendations for script preparation and execution. For more information on JavaScript features or syntax, you can explore resources like: * MDN Web Docs ( Mozilla Developer Network) * ECMAScript Standardization * JavaScript Performance Optimization Guides
Related benchmarks:
spread operator vs push test - correct
spread operator vs push Brian2
spread operator vs push
Array push vs spread when reducing over results
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?