Benchmark: for loops vs forEach test: call functions from new array with 4 items and increment number

Tests:

for...of
let num = 0; const functions = [ () => Math.random() + 10, () => Math.sqrt(Math.random() * 100), () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 50), () => Math.pow(Math.random(), 2), ].map(i => i); for (const fun of functions) { fun(); num++; };
forEach
let num = 0; const functions = [ () => Math.random() + 10, () => Math.sqrt(Math.random() * 100), () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 50), () => Math.pow(Math.random(), 2), ].map(i => i); functions.forEach(fun => { fun(); num++; });
for (C style)
let num = 0; const functions = [ () => Math.random() + 10, () => Math.sqrt(Math.random() * 100), () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 50), () => Math.pow(Math.random(), 2), ].map(i => i); for (let i = 0; i < functions.length; i++) { functions[i](); num++; };

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Previous results

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/149.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 149 on Linux

for (C style)

21.7M/s

for...of

21.4M/s

forEach

19.4M/s

View exact numbers

for loops vs forEach test: call functions from new array with 4 items and increment number (version: 1)