Benchmark: for loops vs forEach test: call functions from Object.values() with 4 items

Script Preparation code:

 var functions = [
    () => Math.random() + 10,
    () => Math.sqrt(Math.random() * 100),
    () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 50),
    () => Math.pow(Math.random(), 2),
];
var functionsMap = {};
functions.forEach((fn, i) => functionsMap[i+""] = fn);

Tests:

for...of
const values = Object.values(functionsMap); for (const fun of values) fun();
forEach
const values = Object.values(functionsMap); values.forEach(fun => fun());
for (C style)
const values = Object.values(functionsMap); for (let i = 0; i < values.length; i++) values[i]();

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
for...of
forEach
for (C style)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one month ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:150.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/150.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 150 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
for...of	15556968.0 Ops/sec
forEach	18887886.0 Ops/sec
for (C style)	22517124.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

for loops vs forEach test: call functions from Object.values() with 4 items (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: for...of vs forEach vs for (C style)

Created: one month ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

for...of

forEach

for (C style)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A