Benchmark: for loops vs forEach test: call functions from array with 4 items

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

 var functions = [
    () => Math.random() + 10,
    () => Math.sqrt(Math.random() * 100),
    () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 50),
    () => Math.pow(Math.random(), 2),
];

Tests:

for...of
for (const fun of functions) fun();
for (C style)
for (let i = 0; i<functions.length; i++) functions[i]();
forEach
functions.forEach(fun => fun());

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
for...of
for (C style)
forEach

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one month ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/149.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 149 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
for...of	28919976.0 Ops/sec
for (C style)	25117292.0 Ops/sec
forEach	27821268.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Array loop vs foreach
Array loop vs foreach vs for xxx
js forEach vs for..of
Array loop vs foreach (static & index)
for vs foreach vs some vs for..of fixed
Array loop vs foreach vs every
for vs forbackwards vs foreach vs some vs for..of 2
for loops vs forEach test: call functions from Map() value iterator with 4 items
for loops vs forEach test: call functions from Object.values() with 4 items

for loops vs forEach test: call functions from array with 4 items (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: for...of vs for (C style) vs forEach

Created: one month ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

for...of

for (C style)

forEach

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A