Benchmark: Temp Test - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

const num2code = (n)=> n < 10 ? 0x30 + n : n < 36 ? 0x61 + (n - 10) : 0x41 + (n - 36);
const getInt = (()=>{r=Math.random;f=Math.floor;return (a=0,b=0x100000000)=>f(r()*(b-a))+a})();
const getStr = (n)=>String.fromCharCode(...(new Int32Array(n)).map(()=>num2code(getInt(0,62))));

const N = 0x10000;

Tests:

push
const arr = []; for(i=0; i<N; i++) arr.push(getInt());
arr.length++;
const arr = []; for(i=0; i<N; i++) arr[arr.length] = getInt();
arr[j++]
const arr = []; let j = 0; for(i=0; i<N; i++) arr[j++] = getInt();

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
push
arr.length++;
arr[j++]

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/142.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 142 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
push	347.9 Ops/sec
arr.length++;	504.6 Ops/sec
arr[j++]	507.9 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Temp Test (version: 12)

Comparing performance of: push vs arr.length++; vs arr[j++]

Created: 5 months ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

push

arr.length++;

arr[j++]

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A