Benchmark: Array timing 100

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

const array = [];
const indexes = [];
const l = 999;
const iterations = 9999;


for (let i = 0; i < length; ++i) {
	array.push(Math.random());
}

for (let i = 0; i < iterations; ++i) {
	indexes.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * l));
}

Tests:

Array.at(i)
let total = 0; for(let i = 0; i < iterations; ++i) { const index = indexes[i]; total += array.at(index); } console.log(total);
Array[i]
let total = 0; for(let i = 0; i < iterations; ++i) { const index = indexes[i]; total += array[index]; } console.log(total);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Array.at(i)
Array[i]

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/137.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 137 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Array[i]

31K/s

Array.at(i)

30K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ Array[i]	30,832 Ops/sec
Array.at(i)	29,675 Ops/sec

Array timing 100 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `Array.at(i) vs Array[i]`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Array.at(i)

Array[i]

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Array timing 100 (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Array.at(i) vs Array[i]

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Array.at(i)

Array[i]

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Array.at(i) vs Array[i]`