Benchmark: testing array ops

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

function generateArray(n) {
  const ar = [];
    for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
        ar.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * 100));
    }
  return ar
}

var arrayEl = [];

var a = generateArray(100);
var b = generateArray(100);
var c = generateArray(100);

Tests:

...
arrayEl = []; arrayEl = [...a, ...b, ...c];
append
arrayEl = []; arrayEl.concat(a); arrayEl.concat(b); arrayEl.concat(c);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
...
append

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:135.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/135.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 135 on Mac OS X 10.15

View result in a separate tab

append

4.4M/s

...

831K/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ append	4,403,240 Ops/sec
...	831,299 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

The benchmark provided tests the performance of different methods for combining arrays in JavaScript. This is particularly relevant in scenarios where performance is a concern when manipulating large datasets.

### Description of Comparison

1. **Spread Operator Method:**
   - **Benchmark Definition:** `arrayEl = [];\r\narrayEl = [...a, ...b, ...c];`
   - **Test Name:** Not explicitly defined.
   - **Description:** This method uses the spread operator (`...`) to combine the arrays `a`, `b`, and `c` into a new array. This is a modern and syntactically concise way to concatenate arrays.
   
2. **Array.concat Method:**
   - **Benchmark Definition:** `arrayEl = [];\r\narrayEl.concat(a);\r\narrayEl.concat(b);\r\narrayEl.concat(c);`
   - **Test Name:** "append".
   - **Description:** This method utilizes the `concat` method of the Array prototype to append arrays `a`, `b`, and `c` to an initially empty array `arrayEl`. Each call to `concat` does not mutate the original array but returns a new array that combines the input arrays.

### Pros and Cons

#### Spread Operator (`...`)

- **Pros:**
  - Concise syntax; easier to read and write.
  - Enables you to spread not just arrays but also iterable objects (like strings).
  - Suitable for one-liners, making it ideal for quick operations.

- **Cons:**
  - Can lead to performance issues when dealing with extremely large arrays, as it creates a "new" array with each operation.
  - Each set of spread operations creates more intermediate arrays, which could potentially lead to higher memory usage.

#### `Array.concat`

- **Pros:**
  - More traditional and widely understood in terms of array manipulation.
  - It can concatenate multiple arrays in a single call when provided with multiple arguments.
  - Each call to `concat` doesn’t mutate the original array, which can lead to safer manipulations of data structures.

- **Cons:**
  - More verbose than the spread operator.
  - Can be less intuitive at first glance compared to the simplicity of the spread syntax.
  - As with the spread operator, excessive use with large arrays can result in performance drawbacks due to repeated array creation.

### Performance Considerations

The benchmark measures the `ExecutionsPerSecond` to assess performance efficiency. In the test results, it was noted that the `Array.concat` method performs significantly faster than the spread operator method in the tested environment.

### Alternatives

1. **Using `push` with `apply`:**
   ```javascript
   Array.prototype.push.apply(arrayEl, a);
   Array.prototype.push.apply(arrayEl, b);
   Array.prototype.push.apply(arrayEl, c);
   ```
   - This would be an alternative to both methods above, where `apply` is used to push multiple elements from each array into `arrayEl`, which can sometimes perform better than both concat and spread for large datasets, as it avoids the creation of multiple intermediate arrays.

2. **Using Loops:**
   - Manually looping through arrays and inserting elements, though this method is often less efficient due to JavaScript engine optimizations that apply to built-in methods.

3. **Array.from():**
   - You could also use the `Array.from()` method to create a new array from an iterable or array-like object.

In summary, the benchmark compares the performance implications of using modern JavaScript syntax versus traditional methods in array manipulations, allowing developers to make informed decisions based on their performance needs.

testing array ops (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: `... vs append`

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

...

append

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

testing array ops (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: ... vs append

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

...

append

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `... vs append`