Benchmark: array pre alloc n

Tests:

none
const n = 100; function getRandomInt(max) { return Math.floor(Math.random() * max); } const arr = []; for(let i = 0; i < n; ++i) { arr.push(getRandomInt(1000)) }
new
const n = 100; function getRandomInt(max) { return Math.floor(Math.random() * max); } const arrPre = new Array(n); for(let i = 0; i < n; ++i) { arrPre[i] = getRandomInt(1000) }
length
const n = 100; function getRandomInt(max) { return Math.floor(Math.random() * max); } const arrLen = []; arrLen.length = n; for(let i = 0; i < n; ++i) { arrLen[i] = getRandomInt(1000) }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
none
new
length

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 11) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/106.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 106 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
none	16627.1 Ops/sec
new	16091.1 Ops/sec
length	16935.1 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 6 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

The provided JSON represents two benchmark definitions: `array pre alloc n`, which is not explicitly defined in the JSON, and three individual test cases: "none", "new", and "length".

**What is being tested?**

In the context of array creation and populating it with random values, three primary approaches are compared:

1. **Pre-allocated array (`"new"`)**: The `Array` constructor is used to create an array with a fixed length (`n`). This approach ensures that the array's capacity is known beforehand, which can lead to better performance in terms of memory allocation and access patterns.
2. **No pre-allocation (`"none"`)**: In this approach, the array is created dynamically using the `Array` constructor without specifying its initial length. The length of the array is determined by the number of elements added to it during the loop.
3. **Length assignment (`"length"`)**: This method assigns a fixed length to an empty array and then populates it with random values. Although this approach seems similar to pre-allocation, it's not exactly the same.

**Pros and Cons**

1. **Pre-allocated array (`"new"`)**:
	* Pros: Better performance due to reduced memory allocation, predictable access patterns.
	* Cons: May lead to wasted capacity if the actual number of elements is less than `n`.
2. **No pre-allocation (`"none"`):
	* Pros: Can be more memory-efficient if the array grows dynamically during execution.
	* Cons: May result in slower performance due to frequent memory reallocations, and can lead to unexpected behavior if the number of elements exceeds the capacity of the underlying data structure.
3. **Length assignment (`"length"`):
	* Pros: Similar to pre-allocation but with less overhead since no actual array creation is performed initially.
	* Cons: May not be as efficient as pre-allocated arrays, and the performance difference might be negligible.

**Library usage**

There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's essential to note that some benchmarks may rely on external libraries or frameworks for features like random number generation (e.g., `Math.random()`), which is used in these benchmark definitions.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

The benchmark definitions use the `let` keyword for variable declarations and the `++i` operator for incrementing the loop counter. There are no explicit mentions of special JavaScript features like async/await, arrow functions, or modern syntax like template literals.

**Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring other approaches to array creation and population, consider:

* Using a data structure like a linked list or a custom buffer-based array.
* Investigating alternative languages or frameworks that provide optimized array operations.
* Analyzing the performance characteristics of different JavaScript engines or interpreters.

Keep in mind that measuring microbenchmarks can be highly dependent on specific hardware, software configurations, and execution environments. Always consider multiple runs and results when comparing performance differences between various approaches.

Related benchmarks:

array pre alloc n (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: none vs new vs length

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

none

new

length

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 6 months ago):