Benchmark: Boolean cast vs !! test

HTML Preparation code:

<!--your preparation HTML code goes here-->

Script Preparation code:

var test = true;

Tests:

Boolean(val).valueOf()
Boolean(test).valueOf()
Double Negation (!!)
!!test

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Boolean(val).valueOf()
Double Negation (!!)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 134 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Boolean(val).valueOf()	185899168.0 Ops/sec
Double Negation (!!)	232901216.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

In the provided benchmark, two methods of converting a value to a boolean in JavaScript are tested:

1. **Boolean(test).valueOf()**
2. **Double Negation (!!)**

### Description of the Approaches:

#### 1. Boolean(test).valueOf()
- **What it does**: This approach first creates a Boolean object from the `test` variable (which is `true` in this case) and then calls the `.valueOf()` method on that object. The `.valueOf()` method returns the primitive value of the Boolean object (i.e., `true`).
- **Pros**:
  - It is explicit. Someone reading the code can understand that you are converting to a boolean.
  - It may be useful in contexts where you are packaging a primitive value in an object.
- **Cons**:
  - This method is less efficient due to the overhead of creating a Boolean object. Object creation has a performance cost, especially in tight loops or performance-sensitive applications.
  - While it provides clarity, it does so at the expense of performance for simple boolean checks.

#### 2. Double Negation (!!)
- **What it does**: The double negation (`!!`) takes the truthy or falsy value of a variable and converts it to a Boolean primitive. The first negation (`!`) converts the value to a boolean primitive and then negates it, while the second negation reverses it back to the expected boolean value.
- **Pros**:
  - It is concise and performs efficiently since it doesn’t involve any object creation.
  - It is a common idiom in JavaScript, making it recognizable to many developers.
- **Cons**:
  - Some may argue that it is less readable for those not familiar with the idiom, which can lead to misunderstandings, especially among developers new to JavaScript.
  - It requires an understanding of truthiness and falsiness in JavaScript, which may not be as intuitive for all developers.

### Benchmark Results:
The latest benchmark results indicate the performance of both methods when executed in a specific environment (Chrome 134 on a Windows desktop):

- **Double Negation (!!)**: Achieved **256,666,064 executions per second**.
- **Boolean(val).valueOf()**: Achieved **189,478,016 executions per second**.

This shows that the double negation method is significantly faster than the `Boolean(val).valueOf()` method, reinforcing the preference for `!!` in performance-sensitive scenarios.

### Alternative Approaches:
In addition to these two methods, there are a few other approaches to convert values to a boolean in JavaScript, including:

- **Using the `Boolean` function directly**: Instead of chaining with `.valueOf()`, you could simply use `Boolean(test)`, which is also efficient and clear. However, it does not create an object, nor does it offer the clarity of converting to a Boolean object.
  
- **Using conditionals**: You could use an if statement or a ternary operator to evaluate the value, though this is not typically how conversions to booleans are done within the context of performance testing.

### Conclusion:
When evaluating these two methods, the choice often comes down to the balance between clarity and performance. While `Boolean(val).valueOf()` may be clearer to some developers, the `!!` operator provides superior performance and is widely recognized in the JavaScript community. As always, the best choice depends on the specific context of use, the team's familiarity with the code, and the performance requirements of the application.

Related benchmarks:

Boolean cast vs !! test (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: Boolean(val).valueOf() vs Double Negation (!!)

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Boolean(val).valueOf()

Double Negation (!!)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one year ago):