Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
constructor vs double negation
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
constructor vs double negation
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
constructor
Boolean("true");
double negation
!!"true";
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
constructor
double negation
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is not explicitly provided, but we can infer it from the individual test cases. There are two main approaches being compared: 1. **Constructor**: This approach tests the performance of creating a new Boolean object using the `Boolean` constructor. 2. **Double Negation**: This approach tests the performance of evaluating the expression `!!\"true\"`, which is a common idiom in JavaScript to negate a string. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: * Creating a new Boolean object using the `Boolean` constructor * Evaluating the expression `!!\"true\"` **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Constructor**: * Pros: + Creates a new, isolated Boolean object, which can be beneficial for memory management. + Allows for more control over the creation process. * Cons: + May incur overhead due to the creation of a new object. 2. **Double Negation**: * Pros: + Evaluates the expression in a single step, reducing overhead. + Does not create a new Boolean object. * Cons: + The expression `!!\"true\"` is less readable and may lead to confusion. **Library and Special JavaScript Feature** Neither of the test cases uses any external libraries or special JavaScript features. They are simple examples that focus on comparing two different approaches to creating a Boolean value. **Other Alternatives** If you want to create a new Boolean object, you could also use the `new Boolean()` syntax or the `Boolean` function with no arguments (e.g., `Boolean()`). However, these alternatives are not being tested in this benchmark. The double negation approach can be achieved using other methods, such as using the ternary operator (`true ? true : false`) or using a regular expression to extract the first character of the string (`/t/e/.test("true") ? true : false`). However, these alternatives are not being tested in this benchmark. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The provided JSON does not include any script preparation code. This means that the test cases will run without any additional setup or initialization. The `Script Preparation Code` field is left blank, indicating that no special setup is required for running the tests. In summary, the benchmark compares two approaches to creating a Boolean value: using the `Boolean` constructor and evaluating the expression `!!\"true\"`. While both methods have their pros and cons, the double negation approach is generally faster but less readable.
Related benchmarks:
Picon dev - insatnce of vs isPrototyOf
Class comp
class vs function composition
object mixin compare
Class cost
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?