Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
test !! && Boolean()
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
!! vs Boolean
Created:
3 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
!!
!!2
Boolean
Boolean(2)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
!!
Boolean
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided JSON for you. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JavaScript expression that can be either a single statement or an expression involving multiple operators. In this case, it's: `"!!2"` This expression checks if `!!` (double negation) applied to 2 yields a truthy value. The `!!` operator converts its operand to a boolean and then performs double negation on it. **Options Compared** There are two options compared in the benchmark: 1. `!!`: Double negation. 2. `Boolean()`: A function that returns a boolean value. Let's explore each option: ### **Double Negation (`!!`)** Pros: * Fast: Double negation is an atomic operation that doesn't require any additional checks or evaluations. * Simple: The expression is straightforward and easy to understand. Cons: * Can lead to unexpected results if used with non-boolean values. * May not be immediately clear what the intention behind using `!!` in this context is (without seeing the full benchmark definition). ### **Boolean()** Pros: * Explicit: Using `Boolean()` explicitly conveys that the function returns a boolean value, making the intent clearer. Cons: * Slower: The `Boolean()` function creates an instance of the `Boolean` class and returns it. This might incur additional overhead due to object creation. * Verbose: Using `Boolean()` requires more characters than using double negation (`!!`). **Other Considerations** In JavaScript, `!!` can be a bit confusing because its behavior depends on the context. For instance: ```javascript console.log(!!null); // true console.log(!!undefined); // false ``` This can lead to unexpected results if not used carefully. **Library: Boolean()** The `Boolean()` function creates an instance of the `Boolean` class, which is a wrapper around the native boolean value. This allows for more explicit control over boolean values and provides additional features like methods for customizing boolean behavior. In this benchmark, using `Boolean()` might be intended to demonstrate its usage and potential performance implications. **Alternative Approaches** Other alternatives for comparing these two options could include: * Using a single expression with a conditional statement (e.g., `x ? y : z`) * Comparing the results of `!!` vs. `Boolean(x)` using a different data type (e.g., numbers) * Implementing a custom function to perform similar comparisons Keep in mind that these alternatives might alter the original intent or performance characteristics of the benchmark. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
Boolean constructor vs double negotiation trick in javascript
Switch vs boolean inline
Boolean constructor vs double negotiation trick in javascript 2
Boolean constructor vs double negotiation trick in javascript 3
Is ternary operator, if-else or logical OR faster
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?