Benchmark: Lodash clone VS spread operator v4.17.21

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var MyObject = {
  description: 'a',
  myNumber: 123456789,
  myBoolean: true,
};

var myCopy = null;

Tests:

Lodash clone
myCopy = _.clone(MyObject);
Spread operator
myCopy = {...MyObject};

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash clone
Spread operator

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 120 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash clone	1314737.6 Ops/sec
Spread operator	5269673.5 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Definition**
The benchmark is comparing two approaches to create a copy of an object: using Lodash's `clone()` method (`_.clone(MyObject)`) versus the spread operator (`{...MyObject}`).

**Options Compared**

1. **Lodash Clone**: The first option uses Lodash, a popular JavaScript utility library, to clone the object. Lodash provides various functions for common tasks, including data manipulation and iteration.
2. **Spread Operator**: The second option uses the spread operator (`{...MyObject}`), which is a built-in feature in modern JavaScript that allows creating new objects by copying properties from an existing object.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **Lodash Clone**
	* Pros:
		+ More flexible and customizable, as Lodash provides various options for cloning (e.g., `_.cloneDeep()`, `_.cloneWith()`)
		+ Supports complex data structures like arrays and objects
	* Cons:
		+ Requires an external library, which may add overhead
		+ May not be as performant as the built-in spread operator
2. **Spread Operator**
	* Pros:
		+ Built-in feature, so no additional library is required
		+ Fast and efficient
	* Cons:
		+ Only supports shallow copying of properties (i.e., doesn't copy nested objects or arrays)
		+ May not be as flexible as Lodash's cloning methods

**Other Considerations**

1. **Lodash Library**: As mentioned earlier, Lodash is a popular utility library that provides various functions for common tasks. In this benchmark, the `clone()` method is used to create a deep copy of the object.
2. **JavaScript Features**: This benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond the spread operator.

**Other Alternatives**

1. **JSON.parse(JSON.stringify())**: Another way to create a shallow copy of an object in JavaScript, but this approach also requires the `JSON` library and may be slower than the built-in spread operator.
2. **Object.assign()**: A method for merging properties from one or more source objects into a target object. While not exactly creating a copy, it can be used to create a new object with merged properties.

In summary, this benchmark compares two approaches to create a copy of an object: using Lodash's `clone()` method and the spread operator. The spread operator is a built-in feature that provides fast and efficient shallow copying, while Lodash's cloning methods offer more flexibility and customization options at the cost of additional library overhead.

Related benchmarks:

Lodash clone VS spread operator v4.17.21 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash clone vs Spread operator

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lodash clone

Spread operator

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):