Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash cloneDeep VS spread operator VS Lodash clone
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash cloneDeep vs Spread operator vs Lodash clone
Created:
5 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var MyObject = { description: 'a', myNumber: 123456789, myBoolean: true, }; var myCopy = null;
Tests:
Lodash cloneDeep
myCopy = _.cloneDeep(MyObject);
Spread operator
myCopy = {...MyObject};
Lodash clone
myCopy = _.clone(MyObject);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash cloneDeep
Spread operator
Lodash clone
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 128 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Lodash cloneDeep
1647593.9 Ops/sec
Spread operator
7082806.5 Ops/sec
Lodash clone
2033810.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition JSON:** The benchmark is defined by a JSON object that contains three key components: * `Script Preparation Code`: This code is executed on the client-side to prepare the environment for the benchmark. In this case, it creates an object `MyObject` with several properties (description, number, and boolean). The `myCopy` variable is initialized as null. * `Html Preparation Code`: This code is also executed on the client-side to prepare the HTML environment for the benchmark. It includes a script tag that loads the Lodash library version 4.17.5 from a CDN. **Individual Test Cases:** The test cases are defined in an array of objects, each representing a single test case. There are three test cases: 1. `Lodash cloneDeep`: * The benchmark definition code is `myCopy = _.cloneDeep(MyObject);` * This test case uses the `_.cloneDeep()` method from Lodash to create a deep copy of the `MyObject`. 2. `Spread operator`: * The benchmark definition code is `myCopy = {...MyObject};` * This test case uses the spread operator (`...`) to create a shallow copy of the `MyObject`. 3. `Lodash clone`: * The benchmark definition code is `myCopy = _.clone(MyObject);` * This test case uses the `_.clone()` method from Lodash to create a shallow copy of the `MyObject`. **Options Compared:** The three test cases compare the performance of different approaches for creating a copy of an object: 1. **Lodash cloneDeep**: Creates a deep copy of the object using the `_.cloneDeep()` method. 2. **Spread operator**: Creates a shallow copy of the object using the spread operator (`...`). 3. **Lodash clone**: Creates a shallow copy of the object using the `_.clone()` method. **Pros and Cons:** * **Lodash cloneDeep**: + Pros: Creates a deep copy, which is necessary for some data structures that have nested objects. + Cons: Can be slower due to the recursive nature of the deep cloning process. * **Spread operator**: + Pros: Fast and efficient for shallow copies. + Cons: Does not create a deep copy, which can lead to issues with nested objects or arrays. * **Lodash clone**: + Pros: Similar performance to the spread operator for shallow copies. + Cons: Does not create a deep copy, similar to the spread operator. **Library and Purpose:** The Lodash library is used in all three test cases. It provides utility functions for various tasks, including object manipulation (e.g., `_.cloneDeep()`, `_.clone()`). **Special JS Feature/Syntax:** None of the test cases use special JavaScript features or syntax that would require explanation. **Other Alternatives:** If you were to create a similar benchmark, you could consider alternative approaches for creating copies of objects: * Using libraries like Immutable.js, which provides a range of data structures and utilities for immutability. * Implementing your own custom copying logic using JavaScript's built-in methods (e.g., `Object.assign()`, `Array.prototype.slice()`). * Utilizing modern JavaScript features like `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj))` or `Object.create(null)`. Keep in mind that the specific approach chosen would depend on the requirements of your project and the trade-offs between performance, readability, and maintainability.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash cloneDeep VS spread operator
Lodash cloneDeep vs clone vs spread
Lodash clone VS Lodash cloneDeep VS Spread operator with array of objects
Lodash cloneDeep VS spread operator v4.17.21
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?