Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash clone VS spread operator shallow
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash cloneDeep vs Spread operator
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var MyObject = { description: 'a', myNumber: 123456789, myBoolean: true, }; var myCopy = null;
Tests:
Lodash cloneDeep
myCopy = _.clone(MyObject);
Spread operator
myCopy = {...MyObject};
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash cloneDeep
Spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
10 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/138.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 138 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Lodash cloneDeep
2780196.0 Ops/sec
Spread operator
11397504.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested, compared, and discussed. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is testing two approaches to create a shallow copy of an object: using Lodash's `clone()` function (`Lodash cloneDeep`) and using the spread operator (`Spread operator`). **Script Preparation Code** The script preparation code creates a simple JavaScript object `MyObject` with three properties: `description`, `myNumber`, and `myBoolean`. The variable `myCopy` is declared but not initialized. **Html Preparation Code** The HTML preparation code includes a link to the Lodash library (`https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js`) which will be used in the script. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Lodash cloneDeep**: This test case uses the `clone()` function from Lodash to create a shallow copy of `MyObject`. The expected output is that `myCopy` will have the same properties as `MyObject`. 2. **Spread operator**: This test case uses the spread operator (`{...}`) to create a shallow copy of `MyObject`. The expected output is that `myCopy` will have the same properties as `MyObject`. **Pros and Cons** 1. **Lodash cloneDeep**: * Pros: Easy to use, concise syntax. * Cons: Requires an external library (Lodash), may not be suitable for all scenarios (e.g., modifying the original object). 2. **Spread operator**: * Pros: Native JavaScript syntax, easy to read and write, does not require an external library. * Cons: May not work as expected in older browsers or versions of Internet Explorer, can lead to unintended side effects if not used carefully. **Library Usage** Lodash is a popular utility library for JavaScript that provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as array manipulation, object transformation, and functional programming. In this benchmark, Lodash's `clone()` function is used to create a shallow copy of the object. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** The spread operator (`{...}`) was introduced in ECMAScript 2018 (ES2018). It allows creating a new object by taking an existing object as an argument. This syntax can be used to create a shallow copy of an object by spreading its properties into a new object. **Other Alternatives** If you prefer not to use Lodash or the spread operator, there are other ways to create a shallow copy of an object in JavaScript: 1. **Object.assign()**: Assigns values from one or more source objects to a destination object. 2. **Array.prototype.slice() + Object.assign()**: Creates a new array by slicing an existing array and then assigning its properties to a new object using `Object.assign()`. For example: ```javascript var myCopy = Object.assign({}, MyObject); ``` Or: ```javascript var myCopy = Array.prototype.slice.call(MyObject).reduce((acc, val) => ({ ...acc, [val]: val }), {}); ``` These alternatives may have different performance characteristics or be less readable than the Lodash clone function or spread operator.
Related benchmarks:
Lodash cloneDeep VS spread operator
Lodash cloneDeep VS spread operator VS Lodash clone
Lodash clone VS spread operator
Lodash clone VS Lodash cloneDeep VS Spread operator with array of objects
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?